<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 ways to lower benefits costs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.angusmcrae.com/10-ways-to-lower-benefits-costs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.angusmcrae.com/10-ways-to-lower-benefits-costs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:39:32 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Trimble</title>
		<link>http://blog.angusmcrae.com/10-ways-to-lower-benefits-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Trimble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.angusmcrae.com/?p=60#comment-190</guid>
		<description>Angus,

How would an opt-out program typically work?

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angus,</p>
<p>How would an opt-out program typically work?</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angus McRae</title>
		<link>http://blog.angusmcrae.com/10-ways-to-lower-benefits-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus McRae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.angusmcrae.com/?p=60#comment-189</guid>
		<description>Good to hear from you, Michele.  Making vision, short-term disability and sometimes even long-term disability voluntary is certainly an option.  We have found that because of adverse selection the insurers raise the rates if the product is voluntary as opposed to employer paid.  

If the employer wants to stay cost neutral on those benefits we may encourage them to pay 100% (especially on the disability lines) and then make a corresponding decrease in contribution on the medical.  This way the employer gets the lower premium rate associated with 100% ER premium payment, but isn&#039;t coming out of pocket any more than they want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to hear from you, Michele.  Making vision, short-term disability and sometimes even long-term disability voluntary is certainly an option.  We have found that because of adverse selection the insurers raise the rates if the product is voluntary as opposed to employer paid.  </p>
<p>If the employer wants to stay cost neutral on those benefits we may encourage them to pay 100% (especially on the disability lines) and then make a corresponding decrease in contribution on the medical.  This way the employer gets the lower premium rate associated with 100% ER premium payment, but isn&#8217;t coming out of pocket any more than they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele La Motte</title>
		<link>http://blog.angusmcrae.com/10-ways-to-lower-benefits-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele La Motte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.angusmcrae.com/?p=60#comment-188</guid>
		<description>Hi Angus,

I enjoy reading your blog.  In the area of employers not offering vision or STD to cut costs, what are your thoughts on voluntary benefits for those coverages?  In my expereince I have seen employees very happy with paying their own contributions for vision and/or STD.

Best regards,
Michele</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Angus,</p>
<p>I enjoy reading your blog.  In the area of employers not offering vision or STD to cut costs, what are your thoughts on voluntary benefits for those coverages?  In my expereince I have seen employees very happy with paying their own contributions for vision and/or STD.</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Michele</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
